Alabama ZIP code database
Every ZIP Code Tabulation Area in Alabama — 656 rows, 53 columns of population, race and ethnicity, age and sex, income, and housing (owner vs. renter). Across Alabama, the population-weighted median household income is about $67,342, the median home value about $222,037, and 70.2% of occupied homes are owner-occupied.
- 656
- ZIP codes
- 5.1M
- Population
- 53
- Data points
Alabama at a glance
- $67,342
- Median household income
- $222,037
- Median home value
- 39.8
- Median age
- 70.2%
- Owner-occupied
- 2,337,183
- Housing units
- 67
- Counties covered
Income, home value, and age are population-weighted averages of the ZIP-level medians in the file. Counts are exact.
| # | ZIP | City | Population | Homeowner % | Median HH $ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 36013 | Pike Road | 245 | 100% | $174,659 |
| 2 | 35223 | Birmingham | 10,666 | 90.7% | $168,278 |
| 3 | 35213 | Birmingham | 15,603 | 76.1% | $159,824 |
| 4 | 36052 | Pike Road | 874 | 89.3% | $147,656 |
| 5 | 35649 | Decatur | 81 | 100% | $144,000 |
| 6 | 35808 | Huntsville | 1,153 | 2.5% | $142,273 |
| 7 | 35756 | Huntsville | 24,947 | 82.6% | $129,852 |
| 8 | 36113 | Montgomery | 940 | — | $127,558 |
| 9 | 35741 | Huntsville | 4,571 | 84.8% | $124,650 |
| 10 | 35226 | Birmingham | 38,588 | 83.3% | $124,516 |
| # | ZIP | City | Population | Homeowner % | Median HH $ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35242 | Birmingham | 57,374 | 73.2% | $117,047 |
| 2 | 36117 | Montgomery | 53,172 | 63.1% | $74,720 |
| 3 | 36695 | Mobile | 52,690 | 69.4% | $76,040 |
| 4 | 35758 | Huntsville | 50,266 | 69.2% | $117,380 |
| 5 | 35405 | Tuscaloosa | 49,420 | 54.4% | $62,301 |
| 6 | 36830 | Auburn | 49,292 | 56.4% | $70,188 |
| 7 | 36116 | Montgomery | 45,250 | 49.2% | $55,160 |
| 8 | 35215 | Birmingham | 43,903 | 56.6% | $52,793 |
| 9 | 35401 | Tuscaloosa | 43,459 | 27% | $29,152 |
| 10 | 36535 | Bon Secour | 40,628 | 77.4% | $66,714 |
| # | ZIP | City | Population | Homeowner % | Median HH $ | Homeowner GDP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35242 | Birmingham | 57,374 | 73.2% | $117,047 | $2.1B |
| 2 | 35758 | Huntsville | 50,266 | 69.2% | $117,380 | $1.7B |
| 3 | 35226 | Birmingham | 38,588 | 83.3% | $124,516 | $1.5B |
| 4 | 35244 | Hoover | 38,217 | 70.4% | $113,450 | $1.2B |
| 5 | 35173 | Argo | 31,603 | 90.1% | $117,105 | $1.2B |
| 6 | 36532 | Daphne | 38,108 | 82.5% | $89,694 | $1.1B |
| 7 | 36695 | Mobile | 52,690 | 69.4% | $76,040 | $1.1B |
| 8 | 35803 | Huntsville | 29,197 | 83.4% | $100,846 | $1.1B |
| 9 | 36117 | Montgomery | 53,172 | 63.1% | $74,720 | $1B |
| 10 | 35756 | Huntsville | 24,947 | 82.6% | $129,852 | $945.5M |
Homeowner GDP = owner-occupied units × median household income — a proxy for aggregate homeowner spending power in a ZIP, useful for scoring market opportunity. Not an official economic statistic.
Densest: 36503 (Atmore) at 29,590 people/sq mi. Least dense: 36512 (Bucks) at 2 people/sq mi.
All 53 data points
Every column defined in the data dictionary.